Banned my Wavy No proof of any thing and banned my story

[Montu151]

You do have tracers. Whenever I do Hell Night with you, see people from a mile away. It isn't the compass, because whenever someone is in your radius, the compass goes screwy and you can use it as efficiently.

This isn't the place to post it, but when I read your signature about siva I remembered in the seasons finale that....

(SPOILERS! IF YOU HAVE NOT WATCHED DONT READ ON!)


Shiva killed some of those saviors like a beast. But, howd he/she know who to eat....
xD

 

[Knightas]

So, I'm going to ignore the contents of the argument and provide a Psychological standpoint. Simple fact: You're lying, proof of this would be a simple reference to the book: Spy the Lie, now by now you're probably thinking I'm crazy, but let me explain. You didn't deny using tracers in any of your arguments, the one time you did you said, "I didn't even do anything wtf" What you did is called, nonspecific denial. Here.

• If a “no” statement is delivered more of a general focus than a specific expression of denial of the matter at hand (“I didn’t do anything,” “I would never do anything like that”), that’s also significant. It’s subtle but if a person says he didn’t do anything, psychologically he is letting himself off the hook so he doesn’t have to tell a bald-face lie, “I didn’t do it.”

Now if we analyze other sections of your arguments with staff, here.

• Being backed into a corner by the facts of a situation can put a lot of strain on deceptive and can make him go into attack mode. This might take the form of an attempt to impeach your credibility or competence, with questions like, “How long have you been doing this job?’ or “Do you know anything about our organization?” or “Why are wasting my time with this stuff?” What he’s trying to do is to get you to back off, to start questioning yourself on whether or not you’re going down the right path. “Why are you always picking on me?” or “Why don’t you trust me. "Getting a life unlike the rest of Kat and them"
• We’re certainly not at all suspicious of someone who’s just a nice person. But if, in response to a question, a person suddenly increase the level of nicety, that’s significant. A person slips in a compliment during questioning “That’s a nice tie, by the way.” The idea is that the more we like someone, the more we’re inclined to believe him and shy away from the confrontation. "I'm sorry for the trouble I have made, Kat, and all the other staff here."

In your defense, yes, it's unfair to not get provided proof of your ban, as I moderated on a fairly large server for a year and I know that some staff ban without proof, because maybe they're upset and judgement is impaired, it's all natural. In conclusion, you're lying... I don't think you should be un-banned. Just my two cents.

Mine blown.

 

[Diligen]

All you really have to do is ask for proof of why you are banned. Most of the time, if not all of the time, they'll give it to you. I guess it really depends on the staff member, though.

 

[3sw]

So, I'm going to ignore the contents of the argument and provide a Psychological standpoint. Simple fact: You're lying, proof of this would be a simple reference to the book: Spy the Lie, now by now you're probably thinking I'm crazy, but let me explain. You didn't deny using tracers in any of your arguments, the one time you did you said, "I didn't even do anything wtf" What you did is called, nonspecific denial. Here.

• If a “no” statement is delivered more of a general focus than a specific expression of denial of the matter at hand (“I didn’t do anything,” “I would never do anything like that”), that’s also significant. It’s subtle but if a person says he didn’t do anything, psychologically he is letting himself off the hook so he doesn’t have to tell a bald-face lie, “I didn’t do it.”

Now if we analyze other sections of your arguments with staff, here.

• Being backed into a corner by the facts of a situation can put a lot of strain on deceptive and can make him go into attack mode. This might take the form of an attempt to impeach your credibility or competence, with questions like, “How long have you been doing this job?’ or “Do you know anything about our organization?” or “Why are wasting my time with this stuff?” What he’s trying to do is to get you to back off, to start questioning yourself on whether or not you’re going down the right path. “Why are you always picking on me?” or “Why don’t you trust me. "Getting a life unlike the rest of Kat and them"
• We’re certainly not at all suspicious of someone who’s just a nice person. But if, in response to a question, a person suddenly increase the level of nicety, that’s significant. A person slips in a compliment during questioning “That’s a nice tie, by the way.” The idea is that the more we like someone, the more we’re inclined to believe him and shy away from the confrontation. "I'm sorry for the trouble I have made, Kat, and all the other staff here."

In your defense, yes, it's unfair to not get provided proof of your ban, as I moderated on a fairly large server for a year and I know that some staff ban without proof, because maybe they're upset and judgement is impaired, it's all natural. In conclusion, you're lying... I don't think you should be un-banned. Just my two cents.

My god, teach me your ways of Psychology, you seem like you know your stuff. Dang, xD. I could've explained that in a much simpler way, hes in a hole and hes trying to get himself out. But that's, that's something else...

 

[Knightas]

My god, teach me your ways of Psychology, you seem like you know your stuff. Dang, xD. I could've explained that in a much simpler way, hes in a hole and hes trying to get himself out. But that's, that's something else...

My brain can't even prossess the things he had said, I'm shocked......

 

[DemonicSpartin]

So, I'm going to ignore the contents of the argument and provide a Psychological standpoint. Simple fact: You're lying, proof of this would be a simple reference to the book: Spy the Lie, now by now you're probably thinking I'm crazy, but let me explain. You didn't deny using tracers in any of your arguments, the one time you did you said, "I didn't even do anything wtf" What you did is called, nonspecific denial. Here.

• If a “no” statement is delivered more of a general focus than a specific expression of denial of the matter at hand (“I didn’t do anything,” “I would never do anything like that”), that’s also significant. It’s subtle but if a person says he didn’t do anything, psychologically he is letting himself off the hook so he doesn’t have to tell a bald-face lie, “I didn’t do it.”

Now if we analyze other sections of your arguments with staff, here.

• Being backed into a corner by the facts of a situation can put a lot of strain on deceptive and can make him go into attack mode. This might take the form of an attempt to impeach your credibility or competence, with questions like, “How long have you been doing this job?’ or “Do you know anything about our organization?” or “Why are wasting my time with this stuff?” What he’s trying to do is to get you to back off, to start questioning yourself on whether or not you’re going down the right path. “Why are you always picking on me?” or “Why don’t you trust me. "Getting a life unlike the rest of Kat and them"
• We’re certainly not at all suspicious of someone who’s just a nice person. But if, in response to a question, a person suddenly increase the level of nicety, that’s significant. A person slips in a compliment during questioning “That’s a nice tie, by the way.” The idea is that the more we like someone, the more we’re inclined to believe him and shy away from the confrontation. "I'm sorry for the trouble I have made, Kat, and all the other staff here."

In your defense, yes, it's unfair to not get provided proof of your ban, as I moderated on a fairly large server for a year and I know that some staff ban without proof, because maybe they're upset and judgement is impaired, it's all natural. In conclusion, you're lying... I don't think you should be un-banned. Just my two cents.

i said 3 diff times i didnt even use tracers plus i said it in my appeal to

 

[xHobbes]

i said 3 diff times i didnt even use tracers plus i said it in my appeal to

Saying you didn't use them doesn't make it true.

 

[Wavy_Buster]

Time to wrap this up.

Although you've killed me multiple times while I was pvping, I didn't even care, by going out of the safezone means that I've pretty much accepted the fact that I would get killed in-game somehow. The reason I was actually watching you was because you were reported by a player whom I'll have to disclose his username, you've managed to find me shifting and hiding in a corner. After being banned, you've made this disrespectful post and an appeal, lying that you weren't hacking and going as far as to say that the staff team are wasting their lives. Therefore, you'll not be unbanned.

-Wavy

 

[UnknownMelody]

Sorry, I am not really backing you up. I am question the events that lead to the situation. Where normal users have to provide hard evidence, but a mod can ban at will. I am question the check and balances of the rules. That they are black and white,instead of always grey.

I just wanted to simply state that all staff need evidence before banning anyone. If they do not have evidence, the ban is not viable and should be lifted. If the banned player asks for evidence in an appeal and the staff member does not provide them with it, the banned player may need to message their superior. If anyone knows of any recent situations where a player has been banned without evidence (even though they've asked for it through an appeal), please message me or another Sr. Mod+ about it and we will look into the situation further. Thank you. c:

 

[Cactiee]

This isn't the place to post it, but when I read your signature about siva I remembered in the seasons finale that....

(SPOILERS! IF YOU HAVE NOT WATCHED DONT READ ON!)


Shiva killed some of those saviors like a beast. But, howd he/she know who to eat....
xD

Make a post i wanna talk about this xD

 

[Knightas]

Time to wrap this up.

Although you've killed me multiple times while I was pvping, I didn't even care, by going out of the safezone means that I've pretty much accepted the fact that I would get killed in-game somehow. The reason I was actually watching you was because you were reported by a player whom I'll have to disclose his username, you've managed to find me shifting and hiding in a corner. After being banned, you've made this disrespectful post and an appeal, lying that you weren't hacking and going as far as to say that the staff team are wasting their lives. Therefore, you'll not be unbanned.

-Wavy

hit em with the hammer of justice wavy

 

[Montu151]

Make a post i wanna talk about this xD

later, I'm too lazy right now

 

[DDENGAR]

#Don'tFokwithWavy

 

[Knightas]

#Don'tFokwithWavy

Agreed he's a angry jelly fish.